This postage, issued in 1937 as part of the Army-Navy series, depicts the Confederate General on a 30-cent denomination. The design, based on a Matthew Brady photograph, features a portrait of Lee in uniform. It exemplifies a period in American history when figures from the Confederacy were commemorated on U.S. postage.
The stamp’s release reflects the complex historical landscape of the United States in the mid-20th century. While intended to honor a prominent military leader, the choice of subject sparked controversy, given Lee’s role in the Civil War and its connection to slavery. Its issuance provides insight into the evolving national discourse surrounding the legacy of the Confederacy and its place within American memory. This stamp also serves as a tangible piece of postal history, representing the design aesthetics and printing techniques of its era. For collectors, the item remains a significant piece of American philately.
Further exploration of this topic could delve into the public reaction to the stamp’s release, the political climate surrounding its creation, its value within stamp collecting circles, and its broader significance in the context of American history and Confederate iconography.
The following offers guidance for individuals seeking to acquire or enhance their collection of the 1937 Army-Navy series, focusing on the 30-cent denomination featuring Robert E. Lee.
Tip 1: Condition is Paramount: Condition significantly impacts value. Prioritize stamps with minimal imperfections, such as tears, creases, or fading. Examples with original gum and centering are highly desirable.
Tip 2: Authentication Matters: Obtain stamps from reputable dealers or auction houses specializing in philately. Certification by a recognized philatelic authority adds an extra layer of assurance.
Tip 3: Research Market Value: Consult stamp catalogs, online marketplaces, and auction records to understand the current market value for various conditions of the stamp.
Tip 4: Proper Storage is Crucial: Store stamps in acid-free albums or mounts to prevent deterioration. Avoid exposure to direct sunlight, humidity, and temperature fluctuations.
Tip 5: Understand Variations: Be aware of potential variations in the stamp, such as different perforations or watermarks. These variations can influence value.
Tip 6: Consider Professional Grading: For high-value examples, professional grading by a reputable grading service provides an objective assessment of condition and authenticity, potentially enhancing its market value.
By adhering to these guidelines, collectors can build a meaningful collection while ensuring the preservation and value of their philatelic investments. Careful attention to detail and a focus on quality will result in a collection worthy of appreciation.
These considerations offer a starting point for building or expanding a collection. Further research into specialized areas of philately is encouraged.
1. 1937 Issue
The year 1937 marks the release of the Army-Navy series of postage stamps by the United States Postal Service, a series which included the controversial 30-cent denomination featuring Robert E. Lee. Understanding the historical context of this issuance is crucial to interpreting the stamp’s significance and the reactions it elicited.
- Commemorative Intent
The Army-Navy series aimed to honor prominent American military figures from different eras. The inclusion of both Union and Confederate figures reflected a post-Civil War narrative of reconciliation. However, this attempt at unity proved divisive, particularly regarding the inclusion of Confederate leaders like Lee.
- Political Climate
The 1930s witnessed a complex socio-political landscape in the United States, still grappling with the aftermath of the Civil War and Jim Crow era racial segregation. The decision to issue a stamp honoring a Confederate general during this period ignited debate about national identity, historical memory, and racial inequality.
- Philatelic Context
Within the broader context of stamp collecting, the 1937 Army-Navy series represents a distinct period in American philatelic history. The design aesthetics, printing techniques, and the historical figures depicted contribute to the series’ significance for collectors. The controversy surrounding specific stamps, like the Lee 30-cent, further enhances their value and interest within philatelic circles.
- Lasting Legacy
The issuance of the Robert E. Lee stamp in 1937 continues to resonate today. It serves as a reminder of the complexities of American history and the ongoing debates surrounding Confederate iconography. The stamp’s existence prompts reflection on the evolution of historical interpretation and the ongoing dialogue about race, memory, and national identity in the United States.
These facets of the 1937 issue underscore the significance of the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp as more than just a piece of postage. It represents a tangible link to a specific historical moment, encapsulating the political, social, and cultural tensions of its time. The stamp’s ongoing presence in collections prompts continued discussion and re-evaluation of its historical context and meaning.
The Army-Navy series, issued in 1937, provides crucial context for understanding the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp. This series sought to commemorate prominent American military figures, encompassing individuals from both the Union and Confederacy. This approach, intended to foster a sense of national unity decades after the Civil War, proved controversial. The inclusion of Confederate figures like Lee within this commemorative series generated significant debate and continues to be a subject of discussion.
- Commemorative Scope
The series encompassed a range of military leaders from different periods of American history, reflecting a broad perspective on military contributions. The inclusion of figures from both sides of the Civil War underscores the series’ ambition to represent a unified national narrative. However, this inclusivity also became a source of contention, highlighting the enduring divisions within American society regarding the legacy of the Confederacy.
- Design and Production
The stamps in the series, including the Lee stamp, exhibit the design aesthetics and printing techniques characteristic of the 1930s. Engraved portraits, often based on historical photographs, were a common feature. Understanding the production methods employed provides insight into the stamp’s physical characteristics and its place within philatelic history. The specific design choices for the Lee stamp, such as the use of a Matthew Brady photograph, contribute to its historical significance.
- Public Reception and Controversy
The release of the Army-Navy series generated mixed public reactions. While some viewed it as a gesture of reconciliation, others criticized the inclusion of Confederate figures, particularly Lee, as an affront to those who fought against the Confederacy. This controversy reveals the complexities of historical memory and the ongoing debates about how to represent contentious figures from the past. The Lee stamp became a focal point for these discussions, highlighting the challenges of national reconciliation and the enduring legacy of the Civil War.
- Philatelic Legacy
The Army-Navy series remains a significant set within American philately. The controversy surrounding certain stamps, like the Lee 30-cent, contributes to their historical importance and collectibility. The series continues to be studied and appreciated by collectors and historians alike, offering insights into the historical context of its creation, the design aesthetics of the era, and the ongoing debates surrounding Confederate iconography in American culture.
By understanding the Army-Navy series, one gains a deeper appreciation of the complexities surrounding the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp. The series provides a framework for analyzing the stamp’s creation, its reception, and its enduring legacy within American history and philately. It serves as a reminder of the challenges of interpreting the past and the ongoing dialogue about representation, memory, and national identity.
3. Confederate General
The title “Confederate General” is inextricably linked to the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp, as it directly refers to Lee’s rank and affiliation during the American Civil War. This title carries significant historical weight and informs the stamp’s controversial nature, given the complexities surrounding the Confederacy and its legacy. Examining the facets of this title provides crucial context for understanding the stamp’s significance.
- Military Leadership
Lee’s role as a Confederate General signifies his leadership within the Confederate States Army. His strategic decisions and military actions significantly impacted the course of the Civil War. The stamp, by depicting Lee in uniform, acknowledges this military role, though it does not explicitly endorse the Confederate cause. The depiction prompts reflection on the complexities of commemorating military leaders who fought against the United States.
- Symbol of the Confederacy
Lee’s image became a powerful symbol of the Confederacy, representing its ideals and its struggle against the Union. The stamp’s issuance decades after the Civil War highlights the enduring legacy of Confederate figures in American culture. The decision to feature Lee on a U.S. postage stamp demonstrates the complexities of national reconciliation and the ongoing debates about how to represent historical figures associated with divisive periods in American history.
- Subject of Historical Debate
Lee’s role in the Civil War, his defense of slavery, and his legacy continue to be subjects of historical debate and scrutiny. The stamp’s existence fuels these discussions, prompting critical examination of the Confederacy and its place within American memory. The stamp serves as a tangible reminder of the unresolved tensions surrounding the Civil War and its aftermath. Its presence in collections today encourages continued dialogue and reflection on these historical complexities.
- Philatelic Significance
The “Confederate General” designation on the stamp adds to its philatelic significance. Collectors recognize the stamp’s historical context and its controversial nature, contributing to its value and interest within the field of philately. The stamp’s inclusion in the Army-Navy series further underscores its significance as a representation of a particular period in American history and postal history. The debate surrounding its release enhances its appeal to collectors interested in stamps that reflect broader historical and cultural themes.
These interconnected facets demonstrate how the title “Confederate General” is integral to understanding the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp. The stamp transcends its function as mere postage and serves as a historical artifact that prompts continued discussion about the Civil War, Confederate iconography, and the complexities of national memory.
4. Philatelic Significance
The Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp holds significant philatelic interest, extending beyond its face value. Its historical context, the controversy surrounding its issuance, and its place within a larger commemorative series contribute to its relevance for collectors and philatelic scholars. Examining its philatelic significance offers insight into broader themes of historical memory, national identity, and the complexities of representing the past.
- Rarity and Value
The stamp’s age and historical context contribute to its rarity, impacting its value within the philatelic market. Condition, including centering, gum integrity, and the absence of flaws, significantly influences its desirability and price. While not exceptionally rare, its association with a controversial historical figure enhances its appeal among certain collectors. Market value fluctuates based on demand and availability, but well-preserved examples can command higher prices.
- Historical Context within Philately
The stamp’s issuance in 1937, as part of the Army-Navy commemorative series, places it within a specific period of American philatelic and political history. The series aimed to honor military leaders from different eras, reflecting the nation’s complex relationship with its past. The inclusion of Confederate figures like Lee generated significant controversy at the time, further adding to the stamp’s philatelic relevance. Its existence prompts ongoing discussions about the role of postage stamps in shaping national narratives and historical memory.
- Design and Production
The stamp’s design, featuring an engraved portrait of Lee based on a Matthew Brady photograph, reflects the aesthetic conventions and printing techniques of the 1930s. Understanding the stamp’s production process, including the printing method and perforation types, enhances its philatelic significance. Variations in these elements can further distinguish specific stamps, adding to their collectibility and interest among specialists. The engraved portrait style contributes to its visual appeal and historical character.
- Subject Matter and Controversy
The choice of Robert E. Lee as the subject of a U.S. postage stamp, given his role as a Confederate general, remains a point of contention and discussion. This controversy directly impacts the stamp’s philatelic significance, making it a focal point for conversations about historical memory, representation, and national identity. The stamp’s presence in collections serves as a tangible reminder of these complex historical narratives and the ongoing debates surrounding Confederate iconography in American culture.
These facets of philatelic significance contribute to the enduring interest in the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp. It serves as more than a simple postage item; it represents a historical artifact that embodies complex social and political themes. Its presence in collections prompts ongoing reflection on the role of stamps in reflecting and shaping our understanding of history. The stamp’s controversial nature ensures its continued relevance within the field of philately, prompting discussion and debate among collectors and historians alike.
5. Historical Controversy
The 1937 issuance of the 30-cent Robert E. Lee stamp ignited immediate and lasting controversy. The decision to honor a Confederate general, a figure deeply associated with the Confederacy’s fight to maintain slavery, on a U.S. postage stamp sparked outrage among many, particularly African Americans. This controversy stemmed from the complex and often painful legacy of the Civil War and its enduring impact on race relations in the United States. The stamp became a symbol of these unresolved tensions, representing differing interpretations of the past and the ongoing struggle for racial equality. For example, organizations like the NAACP actively protested the stamp’s release, highlighting the insensitivity of commemorating a figure who represented oppression and the defense of slavery. This act of protest demonstrated the stamp’s power to evoke strong emotional responses and its role in reigniting discussions about racial injustice.
The controversy surrounding the Lee stamp extended beyond its initial release. Over time, the stamp has become a focal point for discussions about Confederate iconography and its place in American public spaces. The debate reflects evolving societal attitudes towards historical figures and the complexities of commemorating individuals associated with controversial aspects of the past. The stamp’s continued presence in collections and its occasional appearance in philatelic exhibitions serve as reminders of these unresolved historical tensions. Its existence prompts continued dialogue about how to reconcile conflicting narratives of the past and how to represent historical figures in a manner that acknowledges both their contributions and their flaws. The removal of Confederate monuments in recent years provides a parallel example of how these historical debates continue to shape public discourse and inform decisions about public commemoration.
Understanding the historical controversy surrounding the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp is crucial for interpreting its significance within American history and philately. The stamp serves as more than a mere postage item; it functions as a tangible representation of the complexities of national memory and the ongoing struggle for racial justice. The stamp’s controversial nature necessitates careful consideration of its historical context and the diverse perspectives surrounding its issuance. This awareness allows for a more nuanced understanding of the stamp’s meaning and its enduring impact on American culture. The challenges of reconciling conflicting historical narratives and representing controversial figures remain relevant today, highlighting the importance of engaging with these complexities rather than ignoring them.
6. Collectible Item
The Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp’s status as a collectible item derives from several interconnected factors. Its age, historical context, and the controversy surrounding its subject matter contribute to its desirability among collectors. The stamp’s issuance in 1937 places it within a specific period of American philately, making it a tangible piece of postal history. Its inclusion in the Army-Navy commemorative series, alongside other prominent military figures, further enhances its collectibility. The series itself represents a distinct moment in American history, reflecting the nation’s complex and often contradictory attempts to reconcile its past. The controversy surrounding Lee’s role in the Confederacy and the debates about commemorating Confederate figures add another layer of significance to the stamp’s collectibility. This controversy distinguishes it from other stamps of the era, making it a focal point for discussions about historical memory, representation, and national identity. For instance, a collector specializing in stamps related to the Civil War might place a higher value on this stamp due to its direct connection to a key figure in the conflict. Similarly, a collector interested in controversial historical figures might seek out this stamp as a representation of the complexities of historical commemoration. These varied motivations contribute to the stamp’s market value and its enduring presence in philatelic collections.
Beyond its historical and thematic significance, the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp’s collectibility is also influenced by its physical characteristics. Condition plays a crucial role in determining a stamp’s value. Factors such as centering, gum integrity (the presence and condition of the original adhesive on the back of the stamp), and the absence of flaws like tears, creases, or fading significantly impact its desirability and price. Collectors often seek out stamps in pristine condition, recognizing that well-preserved examples hold greater historical and monetary value. The presence of variations, such as different perforation types or watermarks, can also affect collectibility. These variations, often subtle, add to the stamp’s rarity and appeal among specialized collectors. For example, a stamp with a rare perforation variety might be highly sought after by collectors who focus on such nuances. The stamp’s scarcity, influenced by factors like print runs and survival rates, further contributes to its collectibility. Stamps with lower survival rates, whether due to damage, postal usage, or other factors, tend to be more desirable and valuable. These tangible aspects of the stamp’s physical form, combined with its historical and thematic significance, create a complex interplay of factors that determine its collectibility.
Understanding the Robert E. Lee 30-cent stamp’s status as a collectible item requires considering both its historical context and its physical attributes. The stamp’s controversial subject matter, its place within a larger commemorative series, and the complexities of its production all contribute to its desirability among collectors. Furthermore, the stamp’s condition, variations, and scarcity play a significant role in determining its value and appeal. Recognizing these interconnected factors provides a comprehensive understanding of the stamp’s collectibility and its enduring significance within the world of philately. This awareness allows collectors and historians to appreciate the stamp not only as a piece of postal history but also as a tangible representation of complex historical narratives and the ongoing debates about memory, representation, and national identity. The stamp’s continued presence in collections serves as a reminder of these complexities and its ongoing relevance within American culture.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding the 1937 30-cent Robert E. Lee postage stamp, offering concise and informative responses.
Question 1: Why was a Confederate general featured on a U.S. stamp?
The stamp was part of the Army-Navy series issued in 1937, intended to commemorate military figures from different periods of American history. The inclusion of both Union and Confederate figures reflected a post-Civil War narrative of reconciliation, albeit a controversial one.
Question 2: What was the public reaction to the stamp’s release?
The stamp’s release generated significant controversy, particularly among African Americans and civil rights organizations. Many viewed the commemoration of a Confederate general as insensitive and a glorification of the Confederacy’s fight to maintain slavery.
Question 3: What is the stamp’s value today?
The value varies based on condition, including centering, gum integrity, and the absence of flaws. While not exceptionally rare, its historical context and associated controversy contribute to its desirability among collectors.
Question 4: Where can one find this stamp for purchase?
Reputable stamp dealers, online marketplaces specializing in philately, and auction houses are potential sources for acquiring this stamp. Authentication and professional grading are recommended for higher-value examples.
Question 5: What is the stamp’s significance within philately?
The stamp represents a specific period in American postal and political history. Its controversial subject matter and the debates surrounding its release contribute to its significance within philatelic collections and research.
Question 6: Does the stamp’s existence endorse the Confederacy?
The stamp’s issuance should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the Confederacy or its ideals. It reflects a specific historical moment and the complex narratives surrounding the Civil War and its legacy. Its presence prompts ongoing discussion and critical examination of this historical period.
Understanding the historical context surrounding the Robert E. Lee stamp is essential for interpreting its significance. Further research into the Army-Navy series, the Civil War era, and the ongoing debates about Confederate iconography provides valuable context.
Exploring additional resources regarding stamp collecting and historical analysis offers deeper insight and fosters a more informed appreciation of this artifact’s complex legacy.
Robert E. Lee 30-Cent Stamp
Exploration of the 1937 30-cent Robert E. Lee stamp reveals its multifaceted significance. Issued as part of the Army-Navy commemorative series, the stamp’s depiction of the Confederate general ignited controversy upon its release, reflecting the complex and often fraught legacy of the Civil War. Its philatelic significance derives not only from its age and rarity but also from the ongoing debates surrounding its subject matter. Analysis of its design, production, and historical context provides valuable insights into the political and social climate of the 1930s. The stamp’s presence in collections today prompts continued discussion about the challenges of representing controversial historical figures and the evolving interpretations of the past.
The 30-cent Robert E. Lee stamp serves as a tangible reminder of the enduring power of historical memory and the complexities of national identity. Its existence encourages critical examination of the past and fosters ongoing dialogue about how societies grapple with difficult historical legacies. Further research and continued discussion surrounding this artifact offer opportunities for deeper understanding and a more nuanced appreciation of its place within American history and philately.
