The 1923 regular issue postage stamp featuring Warren G. Harding with a face value of 1 cents is a notable piece of American philately. This denomination was commonly used for postcard postage at the time of its issue. Numerous varieties exist, distinguishable by shade and perforation differences, offering collectors a rich area of study. One notable version is the perf 11 x 10, rarer than the standard perf 11.
This small stamp provides a tangible connection to a specific period in US postal history. The choice of Harding as the subject reflects his presidency (1921-1923), cut short by his untimely death. The stamp’s face value offers insight into the cost of mailing a postcard nearly a century ago. For collectors, the various types and subtypes provide opportunities for specialized collections focusing on shade, perforation, or plate varieties. The stamp’s relative affordability also makes it accessible to those new to stamp collecting.
Further exploration of this topic might include detailed discussions of printing processes, perforation varieties, known errors or misprints, and estimated current market values. One could also delve deeper into the historical context of the 1920s postal system and the significance of postcard communication during that era. The design process and the selection of Harding’s portrait could also be examined.
Tips for Collecting 1923 1-Cent Harding Stamps
Collecting the 1923 1-cent Harding stamp can be a rewarding pursuit. Careful consideration of condition, variety, and authenticity is crucial for building a valuable collection.
Tip 1: Focus on Condition. Examine stamps carefully for flaws like tears, thin spots, creases, and fading. Well-centered stamps with intact perforations generally command higher values.
Tip 2: Recognize the Different Perforation Varieties. The 1923 issue exists with different perforations (perf 11 and the scarcer perf 11 x 10). Identifying these variations is key for accurate valuation.
Tip 3: Understand Shade Variations. The stamp was printed in different shades of carmine rose. Subtle color differences can significantly impact a stamp’s value. Consult specialized color guides for assistance.
Tip 4: Beware of Counterfeits. Authenticity is paramount. Compare potential purchases against known genuine examples and consult expert opinions if necessary.
Tip 5: Utilize a Philatelic Magnifying Glass. A good quality magnifying glass (or loupe) allows for detailed inspection of perforations, printing details, and potential flaws.
Tip 6: Consult Reputable Dealers and Auction Houses. Purchasing from trusted sources helps ensure authenticity and fair pricing. Review dealer feedback and ratings before making a purchase.
Tip 7: Proper Storage is Essential. Protect stamps from humidity, light, and pests. Acid-free albums and mounts are recommended for long-term preservation.
By adhering to these guidelines, collectors can build a meaningful and potentially valuable collection of 1923 1-cent Harding stamps. Understanding nuances like condition, perforations, and shade variations enhances appreciation for these small but historically significant artifacts.
This detailed examination of the 1923 1-cent Harding stamp provides a foundation for further research and informed collecting decisions.
1. 1923 Issue
The “1923 Issue” serves as a crucial starting point when examining the concept of a “Harding stamp 1.5 cents.” While no 1.5-cent Harding stamp exists, anchoring the search within the 1923 issue provides a framework for understanding the available denominations and designs associated with President Harding’s image on postage.
- Denominations of the 1923 Series
The 1923 series included a range of denominations, each serving specific postal needs. Understanding these denominations helps clarify that a 1.5-cent value was not part of the standard issue. Common denominations included 1-cent, 2-cent, and 5-cent stamps, reflecting the postal rates for various mail classes at the time. This knowledge allows researchers to focus on the existing stamps within the 1923 Harding series, like the prevalent 1-cent stamp used for postcards.
- Design of the 1923 Harding Stamps
The 1923 Harding stamps featured a consistent design across denominations, typically a portrait of the late President Harding. Recognizing this design consistency helps differentiate the 1923 issue from other Harding stamps released in different years or with commemorative designs. Focusing on the design elements specific to the 1923 series allows for a more precise identification process, eliminating potential confusion with stamps from other periods.
- Printing and Perforation Variations within the 1923 Issue
Within the 1923 issue, variations exist in printing and perforation methods. These variations, while subtle, create distinct subtypes within each denomination. For example, the 1-cent Harding stamp exists with different perforation gauges. Understanding these variations is crucial for accurate identification and valuation. Although a 1.5-cent stamp doesn’t exist, knowledge of these variations helps refine searches for authentic 1923 Harding stamps.
- Historical Context of the 1923 Issue
The 1923 issue followed Harding’s death in 1923. Placing the stamp issue within this historical context illuminates the significance of these stamps as a tribute to the late president. Understanding the timing of the issue also helps researchers narrow down the timeframe for relevant postal records and philatelic literature. While a 1.5-cent denomination remains absent, understanding the historical context adds another layer to the investigation of the 1923 Harding stamps.
By examining these facets of the 1923 issue, researchers can gain a clearer understanding of the existing Harding stamps from that period and eliminate the possibility of a 1.5-cent denomination. This detailed analysis provides valuable context for understanding the “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” query, directing focus towards the factual elements of the 1923 Harding stamp series.
2. One-and-a-half cent denomination
The phrase “one-and-a-half cent denomination” within the context of “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” presents a compelling paradox. It directly points to a non-existent stamp, prompting investigation into the reasons behind this perceived denomination and its connection to the actual 1923 Harding stamp series.
- Absence of a 1.5-Cent Harding Stamp
Philatelic catalogs and historical records confirm the absence of a 1.5-cent denomination within the 1923 Harding stamp issue. This absence underscores the importance of verifying information before accepting numismatic or philatelic claims. Research into period postal rates and stamp catalogs helps confirm this fact, reinforcing the need for accuracy in collecting.
- Potential for Misinterpretation or Misinformation
The “1.5 cents” designation could stem from several sources: a misreading of historical documents, a misunderstanding of postal rates, or confusion with similar stamps. Examining contemporary postal records can clarify period postage costs and dispel potential misinformation.
- The Significance of Denominations in Stamp Collecting
Denominations play a crucial role in stamp identification and valuation. Accurate denomination recognition is essential for proper cataloging and understanding a stamp’s historical context. Even the erroneous “1.5 cents” reference highlights the importance of this aspect within philately. Comparison with other 1923 issues, like the 1-cent and 2-cent Harding stamps, emphasizes the significance of correct denominations.
- Value Discrepancies and the Importance of Accurate Information
Assigning an incorrect denomination, like “1.5 cents,” can lead to significant valuation errors. Consulting reputable catalogs and expert resources is crucial for accurate pricing. This reinforces the need for relying on verifiable information and avoiding speculation based on inaccurate or unconfirmed data.
Analyzing the “one-and-a-half cent denomination” concept in relation to “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” ultimately clarifies the non-existence of such a stamp while underscoring the importance of accuracy in philatelic research. It demonstrates how an erroneous concept can still serve as a valuable learning opportunity, prompting investigation into related areas of stamp collecting and historical postal practices.
3. Non-existent face value
The “non-existent face value” of 1.5 cents is central to understanding the “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” enigma. No United States postage stamp featuring Warren G. Harding was ever issued with a face value of 1.5 cents. This fundamental fact immediately clarifies that any reference to such a stamp involves a misunderstanding or misinterpretation. Exploring the reasons behind this non-existent value requires examining historical postal rates and the denominations chosen for stamp production. Official postal records and philatelic catalogs definitively confirm the lack of a 1.5-cent Harding stamp. This absence necessitates a shift in focus towards understanding the potential origins of this erroneous concept. One might consider the possibility of confusion with contemporary postal rates, misinterpretations of historical documents, or the conflation of different stamp issues.
Examining contemporary postal rates reveals standardized denominations used for various mail classes. Postcards, letters, and packages each required specific postage amounts. These standardized rates influenced the denominations chosen for stamp production. The absence of a 1.5-cent rate explains the lack of a corresponding stamp. Further investigation might consider the potential for privately produced or unofficial labels resembling postage stamps, sometimes used for advertising or local deliveries. While such labels might occasionally feature presidential portraits, they would not be considered official postage and lack a genuine face value. Differentiating between official postage and these unofficial labels is crucial for accurate philatelic research.
Understanding the non-existent face value of a “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” provides a crucial foundation for accurate philatelic knowledge. It underscores the importance of verifying information against official catalogs and historical records. This case highlights the potential for misconceptions to arise and the need for rigorous research within philately. Further exploration might involve examining the history of postal rates, the evolution of stamp denominations, and the role of philatelic societies in preserving accurate historical records.
4. Potential misunderstanding
The phrase “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” presents a potential misunderstanding within philately. As no such stamp exists, exploring the potential sources of this misconception provides valuable insight into the complexities of historical research and the importance of accurate information within specialized fields like stamp collecting. Examining potential sources of confusion clarifies the factual basis of the 1923 Harding stamp series and enhances understanding of proper research methodologies.
- Misinterpretation of Historical Records
Handwritten postal records or early philatelic catalogs might contain ambiguous entries, potentially misconstrued as a “1.5 cent” denomination. A poorly written “1” could be mistaken for a “1.5,” or a faded decimal point might create confusion. Examining original source material and cross-referencing with established catalogs helps mitigate such errors.
- Confusion with Fractional Postal Rates
While a 1.5-cent stamp didn’t exist, fractional postal rates were common. A postcard might cost 1 cent, while a slightly heavier item could require 1.5 cents. Researchers unfamiliar with these nuances might incorrectly assume a corresponding 1.5-cent stamp existed. Understanding historical postal rate structures is essential for accurate interpretation of related philatelic materials.
- Conflation with Similar Stamps or Pre-decimal Currency
The “1.5 cents” could represent confusion with stamps from other countries or periods utilizing pre-decimal currency systems. A stamp with a value of “one penny ha’penny” (1.5 pence) might be misinterpreted as 1.5 cents. Understanding international philatelic practices and historical currency systems is crucial for avoiding such errors.
- Typographical Errors or Informal Language
Informal descriptions or typographical errors in online forums or personal collections could perpetuate the misconception of a 1.5-cent Harding stamp. Casual references to “one and a half cents” might be misinterpreted as an official denomination. Relying on reputable sources and verifying information against established catalogs is crucial for maintaining accuracy.
Understanding these potential misunderstandings surrounding “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” underscores the importance of rigorous research practices in philately. It emphasizes the need to consult authoritative sources, verify information, and carefully analyze historical context to avoid perpetuating inaccuracies. This exploration reinforces the value of accurate philatelic knowledge and promotes a more nuanced understanding of the 1923 Harding stamp series.
5. Closest equivalent
The “closest equivalent: 1-cent Harding” clarifies the “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” ambiguity. As no 1.5-cent Harding stamp exists, the 1-cent Harding serves as the most likely subject of inquiries using this erroneous terminology. Exploring this connection illuminates the importance of precision in philatelic descriptions and provides a factual basis for understanding the actual stamps issued in 1923 featuring President Harding.
- Visual Similarity
The 1-cent and hypothetical 1.5-cent Harding stamps would likely share the same design elements: Harding’s portrait, the “US Postage” inscription, and similar frame ornamentation. This visual similarity could contribute to confusion, especially among those unfamiliar with specific denominations. Visual comparisons between the 1-cent Harding and other stamps from the 1923 series highlight their shared design features.
- Period Postal Usage
The 1-cent Harding was widely used for postcards, a common form of communication in the 1920s. Someone seeking a “1.5-cent” stamp might be misremembering historical postal rates or confusing postcards with other mail classes requiring slightly higher postage. Researching period postcard rates underscores the prevalence of the 1-cent stamp and its likely connection to the “1.5-cent” misconception.
- Collector Focus and Availability
The 1-cent Harding, due to its common usage, remains readily available to collectors. Its affordability and historical significance make it a popular item. This widespread availability contrasts with the non-existence of a 1.5-cent version, further emphasizing the likelihood of misidentification. Comparing the market availability of the 1-cent Harding with other rarer stamps from the same period highlights its relative abundance.
- Cataloging and Identification
Reputable stamp catalogs clearly list the 1-cent Harding within the 1923 series, specifying its design, perforation varieties, and estimated value. No catalog entry exists for a 1.5-cent Harding, confirming its non-existence and solidifying the 1-cent stamp as the closest equivalent. Consulting standard philatelic catalogs definitively resolves the “1.5-cent” ambiguity.
Examining the “closest equivalent: 1-cent Harding” provides a factual anchor for understanding the “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” query. It demonstrates how readily available information, coupled with rigorous research practices, clarifies philatelic misconceptions and directs attention towards the actual stamps comprising the 1923 Harding series. This exploration underscores the importance of precise terminology and the role of authoritative resources in accurate stamp identification and historical research.
6. Philatelic research importance
The non-existent “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” underscores the importance of philatelic research. While seemingly an anomaly, this very absence drives the need for meticulous investigation, highlighting the significance of accurate information within stamp collecting. Exploring this connection reveals how even incorrect search terms can lead to valuable insights and contribute to a deeper understanding of philatelic practices.
- Verification of Information
Philatelic research provides the tools to verify information, confirming or refuting the existence of specific stamps. Standard catalogs, specialized literature, and expert opinions serve as crucial resources for verifying claims like the “1.5 cent” Harding stamp. The process of verifying this information reinforces the importance of relying on established sources rather than anecdotal evidence.
- Understanding Historical Context
Researching the 1923 Harding stamp issue reveals the historical context surrounding its production, including postal rates, printing methods, and design choices. This context clarifies the denominations actually issued, demonstrating why a 1.5-cent value is improbable. Investigating period postal rates and stamp production practices provides a framework for understanding the available denominations and their intended uses.
- Uncovering Potential Misinterpretations
Philatelic research helps uncover potential misinterpretations or misinformation that might lead to erroneous stamp descriptions. Investigating the “1.5 cent” term might reveal historical sources of confusion, such as misreading old postal records or misinterpreting pre-decimal currency values. Analyzing potential sources of error underscores the importance of careful examination and interpretation of historical data.
- Building Accurate Philatelic Knowledge
Even an inquiry about a non-existent stamp like the “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” contributes to building accurate philatelic knowledge. The process of researching and verifying information strengthens understanding of the 1923 series, including its actual denominations, design variations, and historical significance. This reinforces the idea that even seemingly incorrect information can serve as a starting point for valuable philatelic learning.
The pursuit of accurate information, even concerning a non-existent stamp like the “Harding stamp 1.5 cents,” exemplifies the core principles of philatelic research. This exploration underscores how rigorous investigation enhances knowledge, corrects misconceptions, and fosters a deeper appreciation for the historical and cultural significance embedded within postage stamps. It demonstrates that within philately, the process of research itself holds inherent value, expanding understanding even when the initial query proves to be based on an erroneous premise.
Frequently Asked Questions
This FAQ section addresses common inquiries and potential misconceptions regarding the “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” search term, focusing on the factual aspects of the 1923 Harding stamp series.
Question 1: Does a 1.5-cent Harding stamp exist?
No. No United States postage stamp featuring Warren G. Harding was ever issued with a face value of 1.5 cents. The 1923 series includes denominations of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and higher cents, but not 1.5.
Question 2: What is the most likely source of the “1.5 cents” term?
Potential sources include misinterpretations of historical postal records, confusion with pre-decimal currency or foreign stamps, or a misunderstanding of historical postal rates involving fractional amounts.
Question 3: What is the closest equivalent to a “1.5-cent Harding stamp”?
The closest equivalent is the 1-cent Harding stamp from the 1923 series, commonly used for postcards. This denomination is readily available to collectors.
Question 4: How can one determine the authenticity and value of a 1923 Harding stamp?
Consult specialized stamp catalogs, reputable dealers, or philatelic experts. Factors affecting value include condition, centering, perforation variety, and gum condition (if unused).
Question 5: Where can one find accurate information about 1923 Harding stamps?
Reputable philatelic societies, established stamp dealers, auction houses, and specialized catalogs offer reliable information regarding identification, varieties, and market values.
Question 6: How does the “1.5 cent” misconception highlight the importance of philatelic research?
This case demonstrates the need for careful verification of information, reliance on authoritative sources, and accurate interpretation of historical data within philatelic research. Even incorrect search terms can stimulate valuable investigation.
Accurate philatelic knowledge requires careful research and reliance on authoritative resources. These FAQs clarify the non-existence of the “1.5-cent Harding stamp” while providing guidance for accurate research within the 1923 series.
Further sections of this resource might explore specific aspects of the 1923 Harding stamps, including detailed discussions of perforation varieties, shade variations, and market values.
Conclusion
Examination of the “Harding stamp 1.5 cents” query reveals a compelling case study in philatelic research. While no such stamp exists, the exploration of this misconception underscores the importance of accuracy, verification, and reliance on authoritative sources within stamp collecting. Analysis of the 1923 Harding stamp series, including its actual denominations, design elements, and historical context, provides a factual framework for understanding the potential origins of this erroneous term. The closest equivalent, the readily available 1-cent Harding stamp, offers a tangible connection to the period and serves as a starting point for building accurate philatelic knowledge.
This exploration demonstrates how even incorrect search terms can stimulate valuable learning opportunities. The pursuit of accurate information, even regarding non-existent items, reinforces the importance of rigorous research methodologies and critical thinking within specialized fields like philately. Careful consideration of historical context, potential misinterpretations, and established philatelic resources ensures that collectors and researchers build a foundation of knowledge based on verifiable evidence. This approach strengthens the integrity of philatelic scholarship and promotes a deeper appreciation for the historical and cultural significance embodied within postage stamps.
